Category Archives: Netherlands

Dutch court: sports bet monopoly good, lottery monopoly bad

dutch-court-sports-betting-monopolyThe Netherlands’ highest administrative court says the government has to rethink its lottery monopoly, but monopolies on sports betting and lottery scratch cards can continue to exist.

In 1964, the Netherlands granted Lotto BV (now Nederlandse Loterij) monopolies over lotteries, scratch cards and sports betting, based on the Gaming Act approved that year. When these licenses expired on December 31, 2014, the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) regulatory body automatically renewed them without granting other companies the opportunity to bid for the right to offer these services.

A number of international gambling firms, including Betclic, Betfair and Unibet, along with the European Gaming & Betting Association, challenged the renewal and won lower court victories, only to have the KSA appeal the verdicts.

On Wednesday, the Administrative Law Division of the Council of State upheld the sports betting and scratch card monopolies but ordered the KSA to rethink its decision to renew Lotto BV’s numerical lottery monopoly.

The Council of State declared that, while the sports and scratch monopolies undoubtedly ran contrary to European Union trade rules governing the free movement of services, they were nonetheless justified due to EU loopholes for monopolies that claim to be protecting consumers, combating illegality and minimizing gambling addiction.

However, the Council of State said it saw no difference in the likelihood of someone becoming addicted to Lotto BV’s lottery products versus the traditional draws offered by the country’s six licensed charity lottery operators. The KSA will now have to open a tender for lottery rights or come up with some other reason to justify Lotto BV’s most favored nation status.

It’s worth noting that Lotto BV’s ongoing sports betting monopoly applies only to land-based betting. Online sports betting licenses are expected to be open to multiple companies once the Dutch senate okays the Remote Gaming Bill, which was approved by the legislature’s lower chamber nearly two years ago but has been languishing in legislative purgatory ever since.


Source link

Leading 10 Holland times in 2016

This is a visitor contribution by Willem van Oort is the founder of Gaming in Holland. If you would like to submit a contribution make sure you speak to Bill Beatty for submission information. Thank you. 

Top ten holland 20162016 is wanting to go down in the historical past guides as a pivotal calendar year for gaming in the Netherlands.

Among this year’s highlights are the adoption of the distant gaming monthly bill by the Decreased House, the very first granting of a charity lottery license to a new market place entrant in just about 30 decades, and the proposal of laws to privatize condition-owned Holland On line casino.

You should be part of us in remembering 2016 by way of our 10 most-examine content of the calendar year!

one. Privatization of Holland On line casino Could Get paid the Netherlands up to €1bn (May well 18, 2016)

After the Dutch federal government submitted a monthly bill to Parliament proposing the privatization and sale of Holland On line casino, insiders rapidly started off speculating about the on line casino chain’s really worth.

In accordance to investigative reporter Stefan Vermeulen, Holland On line casino could internet the Dutch condition as a lot as €1bn – and quite perhaps even much more.

two. Gambling Taxation and Participant Channeling Rate (March 23, 2016)

In March, famous financial investigation and consulting firm Ecorys released a research on the connection involving gambling tax level and the anticipated stage of player channeling.

Their verdict: in scenario of a gaming tax level of 20%, the stated policy target of the Dutch distant gaming monthly bill, a player channeling diploma of eighty%, is on the upper limit of the anticipated array. The present proposal of a tax level of 29% would much more most likely than not outcome in a (a lot) decreased diploma of player channeling.

We followed up with an distinctive Q&A with Robert Haffner, the study’s lead author.

three. Dutch Gaming Authority KSA Grants Lottery License to Lottovate (November 22, 2016)

For the very first time in just about 30 decades, a lottery license was granted to a new market place entrant.

Yet again, we followed up with an distinctive Q&A. This time, with Peter-Paul de Goeij, Running Director of Lottovate Nederland.

4. Gaming in Holland 2016 Recap (June 9, 2016)

Skilled panels at our annual Gaming in Holland Meeting reviewed numerous very hot subject areas, together with the privatization of Holland On line casino, the distant gaming monthly bill, accountable gaming, as perfectly as lotteries and the funding of sports and charities in the Netherlands.

five. How (and Why) Regulated Distant Gaming Will Be Coming to the Netherlands (July 15, 2016)

Willem van Oort reviewed the run-up to, as perfectly as the effects of, the adoption of the distant gaming monthly bill by the Dutch Decreased House on July 7, in an short article that initially appeared on

“The distant gaming monthly bill that recently passed the Decreased House represents a compromise (in time-honored Dutch style) involving the ideas of specific obligation and paternal disapproval of “irresponsible” pursuits such as gambling. As a outcome, we have witnessed, about the past couple decades, many delays, hesitant legislators, and quite a couple illustrations of legislative posturing to signal a Calvinist-tinged ethical distaste of the activity of pursuing unearned prosperity.

But in the long run, a substantial the vast majority of legislators also identified that distant gaming does not prevent at a country’s borders and that regulation is for that reason preferable to a wholly unlawful and unregulated market place.”

6. Looking Back again at the Kalff Katz & Franssen/IMGL Annual Gaming Marketplace Occasion (January 27, 2016)

On Friday, January 22, 2016, regulation organization Kalff Katz & Franssen hosted its Annual Gaming Marketplace Occasion. The 2016 version was co-hosted with the Intercontinental Masters of Gaming Regulation. With about a hundred and fifty attendees from all about the globe representing the on the net and land-primarily based gaming field, as perfectly as consultants, regulators, and policy makers, the celebration was a substantial results.

The major matter of the discussion have been the (sooner or later adopted) amendments to the distant gaming monthly bill that released a uniform gaming tax level of 29% for each the on the net and land-primarily based sectors.

Observe a video summary of the celebration right here.

7. Charm by 21 Notable Gaming Industry experts: “Regulate KOA/Distant Gaming As Shortly As Possible” (June 13, 2016)

At just one place during late spring it appeared that the Decreased House would not vote on the distant gaming monthly bill forward of the looming summer season recess. In reaction, 21 popular gaming gurus, together with Marja Appelman, CEO at the Netherlands Gaming Authority, referred to as on Parliament to vote on the monthly bill as rapidly as attainable.

Not a lot later on, on July 7, the monthly bill was eventually adopted by the Decreased House.

eight. EGR/GiH Breakfast Briefing: What is Future for Holland? (December two, 2016)

On December one, EGR Journal, Gaming in Holland, and SBTech hosted a perfectly-attended Breakfast Briefing on the most current regulatory developments in the Dutch gaming, betting, and lottery markets.

Subject areas of discussion included distant gaming in the Netherlands, lotteries, land-primarily based betting, and – past but not least – the recently introduced tender for the single Dutch horse racing totalizator betting license.

9. Dutch Distant Gaming Bill Heading for Senate Bulk (June 24, 2016)

Even ahead of the remaining vote on the distant gaming monthly bill in the Decreased House, it grew to become apparent that the monthly bill was extremely most likely heading for a Senate the vast majority as perfectly.

Remarkably, during the discussion in the Decreased House just about all political teams expressed displeasure with the Netherlands Gaming Authority (Kansspelautoriteit), citing a deficiency of energy in imposing the present prohibition on on the net gaming – irrespective of the alternatively evident reality that, so considerably, it has been presented couple powers to truly do so.

ten. Senate Committee’s Inquiries on Distant Gaming Bill Released (November 7, 2016)

Forward of its vote (which ideally comes quickly) the Senate Committee for Protection and Justice submitted a number of penned queries to Point out Secretary Klaas Dijkhoff with regards to the distant gaming monthly bill.

Though these queries did not show up much too threatening (signaling greatest Senate approval), the Point out Secretary’s answers could even now enable delineate the eventual interpretation the act is to be presented by the courts and other legal bodies.

While everybody wished the Point out Secretary would react to these queries ahead of Christmas, this seems to not have occurred.

Allow us all hope for a quick resumption of the legislative process in 2017…



Supply website link

Netherlands places gambling applications on discover, says eighteen extra months to controlled sector

May possibly eleven, 2016


netherlands-targets-online-gambling-appsGaming regulators in the Netherlands have launched a purge of on line gambling applications they deem to be illegally serving Dutch punters.

On Wednesday, the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) regulatory body posted a discover on its site saying it would quickly be posting a public list of the offending applications. The KSA mentioned it expects the two the application makers as well as application retailers internet hosting the applications to eliminate the offending goods from their web pages.

The KSA says it has identified 49 applications that at present supply true-cash on line gambling to Dutch punters. The KSA expressed issue for the two true-cash and free-play applications, but for the second is focusing its enforcement efforts on the true-cash goods.

For decades now, the Netherlands has been performing toward a controlled on line gambling sector, but legislators continue to keep dragging their heels, leaving the KSA to continue to keep cracking their whip in a bid to purge the sector of illegality prior to regionally certified operators get their shot.

The Reduce Residence of the Dutch parliament will think about the country’s Remote Gambling Invoice following week but KSA spokesman Martijn van de Koolwijk informed Dutch media outlet Volkskrant that approving the laws has previously endured three delays and he doesn’t expect the controlled sector to start for at least a different eighteen months.

In the meantime, van de Koolwijk insists that the KSA will go on to enforce the regulations, which contain fines of up to €810k or ten% of an operator’s Dutch sector revenue. He also mentioned that the regulator will think about a license applicant’s previous habits in assessing its suitability for a new Dutch on line license.

Court docket UPHOLDS €180k FINES In opposition to 7RED, ROYAALCASINO
Speaking of terrible behaviour, an administrative court docket in The Hague has upheld considerable fines the KSA imposed on some illegal operators. Way again in 2014, the KSA levied fines totaling €180k on the operators of and, as well as on a enterprise featuring guidance solutions to the web pages, for defying the KSA’s orders to quit servicing Dutch gamblers.

In a judgment dated April 20, the Court docket ruled on an attractiveness submitted by the offending businesses, who experienced claimed that the fines contravened European Union free trade concepts, that the the KSA’s enforcement procedures were being arbitrary and ambiguous, that the fines were being disproportionate to the alleged impropriety and that one particular of the businesses fined wasn’t in breach of the regulations.

The comprehensive judgment (in Dutch) can be read here, but the gist is that the Court docket upheld the KSA’s right to spank the offending operators and turned down the companies’ attractiveness wholesale. Cuz the home often wins in the end…

Source website link